IT SBIT Services
Schneeberger
DEEN
CVE tracker

New vulnerabilities – clearly explained

Every newly published security vulnerability (CVE), continuously from the NVD, with the actively exploited ones from CISA, the probability of exploitation (EPSS) and public exploits – each one researched individually: what is affected, what helps, what to do.

New CVEs in the last 30 days by severity

  • Critical
  • High
  • Medium
  • Low
  • Not rated
01,0002,0003,000Sun, 4 Oct 2026: 68 CVE (Critical 13, High 16, Medium 28, Low 11)4 OctMon, 5 Oct 2026: 405 CVE (Critical 31, High 119, Medium 210, Low 45)Tue, 6 Oct 2026: 1,014 CVE (Critical 105, High 371, Medium 345, Low 38, Not rated 155)Wed, 7 Oct 2026: 340 CVE (Critical 53, High 131, Medium 145, Low 9, Not rated 2)Thu, 8 Oct 2026: 497 CVE (Critical 62, High 194, Medium 220, Low 21)Fri, 9 Oct 2026: 315 CVE (Critical 42, High 152, Medium 105, Low 11, Not rated 5)9 OctSat, 10 Oct 2026: 412 CVE (Critical 78, High 143, Medium 178, Low 13)Sun, 11 Oct 2026: 229 CVE (Critical 16, High 73, Medium 101, Low 39)Mon, 12 Oct 2026: 674 CVE (Critical 48, High 264, Medium 282, Low 80)Tue, 13 Oct 2026: 2,303 CVE (Critical 170, High 1,361, Medium 729, Low 43)Wed, 14 Oct 2026: 824 CVE (Critical 92, High 374, Medium 285, Low 30, Not rated 43)14 OctThu, 15 Oct 2026: 546 CVE (Critical 51, High 232, Medium 244, Low 19)Fri, 16 Oct 2026: 465 CVE (Critical 53, High 179, Medium 219, Low 14)Sat, 17 Oct 2026: 100 CVE (Critical 4, High 42, Medium 50, Low 4)Sun, 18 Oct 2026: 549 CVE (Critical 10, High 55, Medium 65, Low 19, Not rated 400)Mon, 19 Oct 2026: 437 CVE (Critical 29, High 128, Medium 204, Low 66, Not rated 10)19 OctTue, 20 Oct 2026: 1,923 CVE (Critical 169, High 813, Medium 812, Low 127, Not rated 2)Wed, 21 Oct 2026: 542 CVE (Critical 50, High 218, Medium 225, Low 47, Not rated 2)Thu, 22 Oct 2026: 492 CVE (Critical 69, High 160, Medium 206, Low 55, Not rated 2)Fri, 23 Oct 2026: 492 CVE (Critical 40, High 169, Medium 90, Low 27, Not rated 166)Sat, 24 Oct 2026: 73 CVE (Critical 12, High 19, Medium 35, Low 6, Not rated 1)24 OctSun, 25 Oct 2026: 131 CVE (Critical 3, High 31, Medium 66, Low 26, Not rated 5)Mon, 26 Oct 2026: 738 CVE (Critical 21, High 130, Medium 245, Low 55, Not rated 287)Tue, 27 Oct 2026: 648 CVE (Critical 69, High 188, Medium 177, Low 33, Not rated 181)Wed, 28 Oct 2026: 626 CVE (Critical 35, High 215, Medium 209, Low 31, Not rated 136)Thu, 29 Oct 2026: 537 CVE (Critical 66, High 191, Medium 218, Low 22, Not rated 40)29 OctFri, 30 Oct 2026: 669 CVE (Critical 44, High 216, Medium 259, Low 30, Not rated 120)Sat, 31 Oct 2026: 112 CVE (Critical 11, High 44, Medium 51, Low 1, Not rated 5)Sun, 1 Nov 2026: 98 CVE (Critical 8, High 24, Medium 27, Low 15, Not rated 24)Mon, 2 Nov 2026: 3 CVE (Critical 2, Medium 1)2 Nov

Per day (UTC); hover over a bar for the figures.

Show as table
DayCriticalHighMediumLowNot ratedTotal
Mon, 2 Nov 2026201003
Sun, 1 Nov 202682427152498
Sat, 31 Oct 202611445115112
Fri, 30 Oct 20264421625930120669
Thu, 29 Oct 2026661912182240537
Wed, 28 Oct 20263521520931136626
Tue, 27 Oct 20266918817733181648
Mon, 26 Oct 20262113024555287738
Sun, 25 Oct 202633166265131
Sat, 24 Oct 20261219356173
Fri, 23 Oct 2026401699027166492
Thu, 22 Oct 202669160206552492
Wed, 21 Oct 202650218225472542
Tue, 20 Oct 202616981381212721,923
Mon, 19 Oct 2026291282046610437
Sun, 18 Oct 202610556519400549
Sat, 17 Oct 20264425040100
Fri, 16 Oct 202653179219140465
Thu, 15 Oct 202651232244190546
Wed, 14 Oct 2026923742853043824
Tue, 13 Oct 20261701,3617294302,303
Mon, 12 Oct 202648264282800674
Sun, 11 Oct 20261673101390229
Sat, 10 Oct 202678143178130412
Fri, 9 Oct 202642152105115315
Thu, 8 Oct 202662194220210497
Wed, 7 Oct 20265313114592340
Tue, 6 Oct 2026105371345381551,014
Mon, 5 Oct 202631119210450405
Sun, 4 Oct 202613162811068

202 vulnerabilities · Vendor: IBM

CVE-2026-14991Critical 9.8

IBM DataPower Gateway: Out-of-bounds write (buffer overflow) allows code execution

IBM DataPower Gateway contains an out-of-bounds write caused by improper bounds checking, which can lead to a buffer overflow. According to the IBM CVE description, a local user could exploit it to execute arbitrary code on the appliance. The CVSS vector (AV:N, PR:N) instead describes a network attack without authentication, so the exposure must be treated as possibly remote until IBM clarifies this conflict.

IBM · DataPower Gateway

CVE-2026-14990Critical 9.3

IBM DataPower Gateway: Cross-site scripting in Web UI

IBM DataPower Gateway versions 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10 contain a cross-site scripting flaw in the Web UI. An unauthenticated attacker can embed arbitrary JavaScript, which may alter the intended functionality of the interface and potentially lead to credentials disclosure within a trusted administrative session. IBM rates the issue CVSS 9.3 (Critical); the user interaction component (UI:R) means a victim must act, for example by opening a crafted link.

IBM · DataPower Gateway

CVE-2026-16340Critical 9.8

IBM DataPower Gateway: Out-of-bounds write in RFC2047 encoded-word parser

IBM DataPower Gateway versions 10.5.0.0 to 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 to 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 to 10.6.0.10 and 11.0.0.0 to 11.0.0.2 contain an out-of-bounds write in the RFC2047 encoded-word parser. A remote attacker can exploit this without authentication or user interaction to execute arbitrary code on the gateway. The CVSS score is 9.8 (critical); the exact feature and input are not described by the vendor.

IBM · DataPower Gateway

CVE-2026-97680High 8.3

Langflow OSS: Improper access control in vertex result cache

IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 contain an improper access control flaw in the vertex result caching subsystem. A remote attacker with a low-privilege authenticated account can obtain sensitive information or inject malicious data into cached results. No user interaction is required, so the risk is mainly relevant for multi-user Langflow deployments.

IBM · Langflow OSS

CVE-2026-97679High 8.8

IBM Langflow OSS: Remote code execution via OS command injection

IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 contain a code injection flaw (CWE-94) related to improper input validation in OS command handling. A remote attacker with valid credentials can execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the Langflow service. Authentication is required, and the CVSS base score is 8.8 (High). Langflow hosts often store API keys and connect to other systems, so the impact can extend beyond the instance itself.

IBM · Langflow OSS

CVE-2026-97678High 8.8

IBM Langflow OSS: Code execution due to improper input validation

IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 contain a flaw caused by improper input validation (CWE-693). A remote attacker with a valid, low-privilege account can execute arbitrary code. Anonymous access is not sufficient, but code runs with the privileges of the Langflow process, so stored credentials, API keys and connected services are at risk. Technical details of the affected code path are not disclosed.

IBM · Langflow OSS

CVE-2026-97676High 8.8

IBM Langflow OSS: Code execution via sandbox escape

IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 contain a flaw that allows a remote attacker with a valid user account to execute arbitrary code. The flaw is a sandbox escape caused by improper neutralization of special elements used in code. The attack requires authentication, but any account that can create or run flows could reach code execution on the server.

IBM · Langflow OSS

CVE-2026-97674High 8.1

IBM Langflow OSS: Code injection enables OS command execution

IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 contain a code injection flaw (CWE-94) in how special elements are handled before OS commands run. A remote attacker with a valid, low-privilege account can execute arbitrary operating system commands on the host. Exploitation requires authentication but no user interaction, and the CVSS 3.1 base score is 8.1 (High). The vector reports high confidentiality and integrity impact and no availability impact.

IBM · Langflow OSS

CVE-2026-97673High 8.8

IBM Langflow OSS: Remote code execution by authenticated users

IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 contain a flaw caused by improper input validation (CWE-693). A remote attacker with a valid low-privilege account can execute arbitrary code without user interaction. Code runs with the privileges of the Langflow service, which often holds API keys and access to other internal systems. The flaw is one of about 25 Langflow issues IBM disclosed together; several of those are unauthenticated and more severe.

IBM · Langflow OSS

CVE-2026-93675Critical 9.8

Langflow OSS: Code execution via dependency confusion

IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 are affected by a dependency confusion flaw, classified as an expected behavior violation (CWE-440). According to the CVE record, a remote attacker can execute arbitrary code, with high impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability. Sources disagree on the CVSS score (9.8 vs. 8.8) and on whether user interaction is required, so the exact attack conditions are not confirmed.

IBM · Langflow OSS

CVE-2026-93674Critical 9.8Public exploit

IBM Langflow OSS: Code injection enables remote code execution

IBM Langflow OSS, the open-source edition of the Langflow platform for orchestrating language models, contains a code injection flaw (CWE-94) in its handling of OS commands. According to the CVE record, a remote attacker can execute arbitrary code on the server, which can fully compromise its confidentiality, integrity and availability. The NVD record lists no privileges required, but the sources conflict on whether authentication is needed, so treat the flaw as potentially unauthenticated until IBM clarifies. The same IBM bulletin lists several other Langflow OSS vulnerabilities in the same version range.

IBM · Langflow OSS

CVE-2026-93449High 8.8

IBM Langflow OSS: Remote code execution via improper code generation control

IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 contain a code injection flaw (CWE-94) that allows a remote attacker with a valid user account to execute arbitrary code. Successful exploitation runs code with the privileges of the Langflow service, which can expose secrets, API keys and data the service can access. The CVSS base score is 8.8 (high), and the attack requires only low-privilege authentication.

IBM · Langflow OSS

CVE-2026-93445High 8.8

IBM Langflow OSS: Code injection allows remote code execution

IBM Langflow OSS, an open-source low-code tool for building AI agents and applications, contains a code injection flaw (CWE-94) in its code generation handling. A remote attacker with a valid user account can execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the Langflow process. An attacker with code execution can reach stored credentials and connected data. The flaw is rated CVSS 8.8 (high).

IBM · Langflow OSS

CVE-2026-93443High 8.8

Langflow OSS: Remote code execution by authenticated users via code injection

IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 contain a code injection flaw (CWE-94) that allows a remote attacker with a valid account to execute arbitrary code. Successful exploitation runs code with the privileges of the Langflow service, which can expose stored API keys, model credentials and data. IBM rates the issue at CVSS 8.8 and recommends upgrading to version 1.12.3.

IBM · Langflow OSS

CVE-2026-88962High 8.8

IBM Langflow OSS: Code injection allows remote code execution

IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 contain a code injection flaw (CWE-94) in code generation. A remote attacker with a valid user account can execute arbitrary code on the host running Langflow, with high impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability (CVSS 8.8). Details of the flaw are not public, and the IBM bulletin does not clearly separate this CVE from the other Langflow CVEs it lists.

IBM · Langflow OSS

Sources

The tracker combines official, freely usable data sources – updated continuously:

This product uses data from the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD. EPSS data © FIRST.org.

Affected? We can help.

We check whether your systems are affected, install updates and close the gap – continuously with the System Health Checker if you wish.