IT SBIT Services
Schneeberger
DEEN
CVE tracker

New vulnerabilities – clearly explained

Every newly published security vulnerability (CVE), continuously from the NVD, with the actively exploited ones from CISA, the probability of exploitation (EPSS) and public exploits – each one researched individually: what is affected, what helps, what to do.

New CVEs in the last 30 days by severity

  • Critical
  • High
  • Medium
  • Low
  • Not rated
01,0002,0003,000Sat, 3 Oct 2026: 115 CVE (Critical 5, High 45, Medium 57, Low 8)3 OctSun, 4 Oct 2026: 68 CVE (Critical 13, High 16, Medium 28, Low 11)Mon, 5 Oct 2026: 405 CVE (Critical 31, High 119, Medium 210, Low 45)Tue, 6 Oct 2026: 1,014 CVE (Critical 105, High 371, Medium 345, Low 38, Not rated 155)Wed, 7 Oct 2026: 340 CVE (Critical 53, High 131, Medium 145, Low 9, Not rated 2)Thu, 8 Oct 2026: 497 CVE (Critical 62, High 194, Medium 220, Low 21)8 OctFri, 9 Oct 2026: 315 CVE (Critical 42, High 152, Medium 105, Low 11, Not rated 5)Sat, 10 Oct 2026: 412 CVE (Critical 78, High 143, Medium 178, Low 13)Sun, 11 Oct 2026: 229 CVE (Critical 16, High 73, Medium 101, Low 39)Mon, 12 Oct 2026: 674 CVE (Critical 48, High 264, Medium 282, Low 80)Tue, 13 Oct 2026: 2,303 CVE (Critical 170, High 1,361, Medium 729, Low 43)13 OctWed, 14 Oct 2026: 824 CVE (Critical 92, High 374, Medium 285, Low 30, Not rated 43)Thu, 15 Oct 2026: 546 CVE (Critical 51, High 232, Medium 244, Low 19)Fri, 16 Oct 2026: 465 CVE (Critical 53, High 179, Medium 219, Low 14)Sat, 17 Oct 2026: 100 CVE (Critical 4, High 42, Medium 50, Low 4)Sun, 18 Oct 2026: 549 CVE (Critical 10, High 55, Medium 65, Low 19, Not rated 400)18 OctMon, 19 Oct 2026: 437 CVE (Critical 29, High 128, Medium 204, Low 66, Not rated 10)Tue, 20 Oct 2026: 1,923 CVE (Critical 169, High 813, Medium 812, Low 127, Not rated 2)Wed, 21 Oct 2026: 542 CVE (Critical 50, High 218, Medium 225, Low 47, Not rated 2)Thu, 22 Oct 2026: 492 CVE (Critical 69, High 160, Medium 206, Low 55, Not rated 2)Fri, 23 Oct 2026: 492 CVE (Critical 40, High 169, Medium 90, Low 27, Not rated 166)23 OctSat, 24 Oct 2026: 73 CVE (Critical 12, High 19, Medium 35, Low 6, Not rated 1)Sun, 25 Oct 2026: 131 CVE (Critical 3, High 31, Medium 66, Low 26, Not rated 5)Mon, 26 Oct 2026: 738 CVE (Critical 21, High 130, Medium 245, Low 55, Not rated 287)Tue, 27 Oct 2026: 648 CVE (Critical 69, High 188, Medium 177, Low 33, Not rated 181)Wed, 28 Oct 2026: 626 CVE (Critical 35, High 215, Medium 209, Low 31, Not rated 136)28 OctThu, 29 Oct 2026: 537 CVE (Critical 66, High 191, Medium 218, Low 22, Not rated 40)Fri, 30 Oct 2026: 669 CVE (Critical 44, High 216, Medium 259, Low 30, Not rated 120)Sat, 31 Oct 2026: 112 CVE (Critical 11, High 41, Medium 44, Not rated 16)Sun, 1 Nov 2026: 71 CVE (Critical 8, High 11, Medium 14, Low 9, Not rated 29)1 Nov

Per day (UTC); hover over a bar for the figures.

Show as table
DayCriticalHighMediumLowNot ratedTotal
Sun, 1 Nov 20268111492971
Sat, 31 Oct 2026114144016112
Fri, 30 Oct 20264421625930120669
Thu, 29 Oct 2026661912182240537
Wed, 28 Oct 20263521520931136626
Tue, 27 Oct 20266918817733181648
Mon, 26 Oct 20262113024555287738
Sun, 25 Oct 202633166265131
Sat, 24 Oct 20261219356173
Fri, 23 Oct 2026401699027166492
Thu, 22 Oct 202669160206552492
Wed, 21 Oct 202650218225472542
Tue, 20 Oct 202616981381212721,923
Mon, 19 Oct 2026291282046610437
Sun, 18 Oct 202610556519400549
Sat, 17 Oct 20264425040100
Fri, 16 Oct 202653179219140465
Thu, 15 Oct 202651232244190546
Wed, 14 Oct 2026923742853043824
Tue, 13 Oct 20261701,3617294302,303
Mon, 12 Oct 202648264282800674
Sun, 11 Oct 20261673101390229
Sat, 10 Oct 202678143178130412
Fri, 9 Oct 202642152105115315
Thu, 8 Oct 202662194220210497
Wed, 7 Oct 20265313114592340
Tue, 6 Oct 2026105371345381551,014
Mon, 5 Oct 202631119210450405
Sun, 4 Oct 202613162811068
Sat, 3 Oct 20265455780115

196 vulnerabilities · Vendor: IBM

CVE-2026-93680Critical 9.8Public exploitEPSS 2.2 %

IBM Langflow OSS: Authentication bypass due to improper authentication

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.8, an open-source tool for building AI agents and workflows, contains an improper authentication flaw (CWE-287). According to IBM, a remote attacker without credentials can bypass security restrictions. IBM groups this issue with other Langflow vulnerabilities, including remote code execution, and a public Metasploit module is reported.

IBM · Langflow OSS

CVE-2026-18894Critical 9.8

Langflow OSS: Code execution via stored Python components in public workflows

IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.4 contain a code injection flaw (CWE-94). A remote attacker can trigger Python component code already stored in a public workflow. The code then runs under the flow owner's runtime context inside the Langflow server process, bypassing the rule that public execution paths may only run server-trusted components. The CVE data provided lists CVSS 9.8, while IBM's bulletin rates the issue 6.5 with a different vector, and the authentication requirement is not confirmed, so check the final score in NVD.

IBM · Langflow OSS

CVE-2026-110309High 8.8

IBM Langflow OSS: Arbitrary command execution via code generation

IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.4 contain a code injection flaw (CWE-94) that allows arbitrary command execution on the server. An attacker needs a valid user account on the Langflow instance, and the IBM bulletin describes the flaw as exploitable with low privileges. Successful exploitation would give the attacker the privileges of the Langflow process; the CVSS score is 8.8 (High).

IBM · Langflow OSS

CVE-2026-110196High 8.8

Langflow OSS: Missing authorization allows code execution via code component

IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.4 contain a missing authorization flaw (CWE-862). An authenticated user with a low-privilege account can bypass the administrator-only restriction on built-in code-execution components. By configuring such a component with crafted inputs, the attacker can execute arbitrary code on the server. The CVSS base score is 8.8 (high), with high impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability. Risk is highest where Langflow is internet-facing or where accounts are shared or self-registered.

IBM · Langflow OSS

CVE-2026-110193High 8.8

IBM Langflow OSS: Code injection in Agentic Assistant allows OS command execution

IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.8 contain a code injection flaw in the Agentic Assistant, which generates and validates component code for flows. A remote attacker with any low-privileged authenticated account can cause the assistant to generate or submit component code using unblocked patterns. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary operating system command execution on the server, exposing stored API keys, data and connected systems. No public proof of concept or exploitation in the wild has been found so far.

IBM · Langflow OSS

CVE-2026-110186Critical 9.8

IBM Langflow OSS: Code injection via code generation enables remote code execution

IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.8 contain a code injection flaw (CWE-94) in how code is generated. A remote attacker can use it to execute arbitrary code on the server, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.8 from IBM. The official record does not state that authentication is required, but a secondary source describes it as reachable without login, so treat every instance as exposed until verified. VulDB scores the issue lower (7.3), and the CVE record was published only recently.

IBM · Langflow OSS

CVE-2026-107329High 8.8Public exploit

Langflow OSS: Code injection allows remote code execution

IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.4 contain a code injection flaw (CWE-94) that lets a remote attacker with a valid low-privilege account execute arbitrary code on the server. No user interaction is required. Code runs inside the Langflow process, which can expose workflow data, credentials and connected model, database or tool services. Sources list CVSS 8.8 or 9.9 depending on the scope assessment.

IBM · Langflow OSS

CVE-2026-107328High 8.8Public exploit

IBM Langflow OSS: Code injection via eval/exec allows remote code execution

IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.4 contain a code injection flaw (CWE-94) in the eval/exec code path. An authenticated remote attacker with low privileges can inject code that is executed on the server, which is rated with high impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability. No user interaction is required, but the attacker needs a valid account on the Langflow instance.

IBM · Langflow OSS

CVE-2026-107327High 8.8Public exploit

IBM Langflow OSS: Missing authorization allows remote code execution

IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.4 contain a missing authorization flaw (CWE-862). A remote attacker with a valid, low-privileged account can execute arbitrary code on the server. The IBM record does not name the vulnerable feature. Code execution would run with the privileges of the Langflow process, which typically holds LLM API keys and flow data.

IBM · Langflow OSS

CVE-2026-107326High 8.8Public exploit

Langflow OSS: OS command injection enables remote code execution

IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.4 contain an OS command injection flaw (CWE-78). An authenticated remote attacker can inject operating system commands and execute arbitrary code on the server, with full impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability. Exploitation requires a valid user account on the Langflow instance.

IBM · Langflow OSS

CVE-2026-104339Critical 9.8

Langflow OSS: Code injection enables remote code execution

IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 contain an OS command injection flaw (CWE-94 per NVD, description matches CWE-78) that allows remote code execution on the server. According to the CVE record, an attacker needs no privileges and no user interaction, so the flaw is reachable over the network. The CVSS base score is 9.8 (critical), and the CVE was published on 29 October 2026.

IBM · Langflow OSS

CVE-2026-104328High 8.8

IBM Langflow OSS: Remote code execution via OS command injection

IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 do not properly neutralize special elements used in an OS command. A remote attacker with a valid, low-privileged account can execute arbitrary code on the server without user interaction, which may expose stored credentials such as API keys. Langflow listens on localhost by default, so the risk depends on how it is deployed and who can reach it.

IBM · Langflow OSS

CVE-2026-104317Critical 9.8

IBM Langflow OSS: Deserialization of untrusted data allows code execution

IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 deserialize untrusted data from the message broker. A remote attacker who can reach the message broker can execute arbitrary code on the system. The NVD record rates the issue CVSS 9.8 (critical), but other sources rate it lower, so the score should be verified. No exploitation is known.

IBM · Langflow OSS

CVE-2026-103092High 8.8

IBM Langflow OSS: Arbitrary SQL command execution via improper access control

IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 contain an improper access control flaw that allows a remote attacker with a valid user account to execute arbitrary SQL commands. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to read, modify or delete data in the underlying database. NVD lists a CVSS score of 8.8, while IBM lists 8.5 with a scope change for this CVE.

IBM · Langflow OSS

CVE-2026-101288High 8.8

Langflow OSS: Code injection leads to remote code execution

IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 contain a code injection flaw (CWE-94) caused by improper neutralization of special elements. A remote attacker with a valid low-privilege account can execute arbitrary code on the server, with high impact to confidentiality, integrity and availability (CVSS 8.8). The exact vulnerable component and trigger are not publicly described.

IBM · Langflow OSS

CVE-2026-93442High 8.2

IBM QRadar SIEM: Out-of-bounds read enabling denial of service or information leak

IBM QRadar SIEM versions 7.6.0.0 through 7.6.0.4 and 7.5.0 through 7.5.0 Update Package 16 Interim Fix 001 contain an out-of-bounds read (CWE-125). A remote attacker can cause a denial of service or obtain sensitive information. According to the CVE record, no authentication or user interaction is required, and the CVSS score is 8.2 (High). The specific vulnerable component is not disclosed in the available sources.

IBM · QRadar SIEM

CVE-2026-93441High 8.6

IBM QRadar SIEM: Denial of service in HTTP Receiver protocol

IBM QRadar SIEM with the HTTP Receiver protocol can be caused to stop responding by a remote attacker due to uncontrolled resource consumption (CWE-400). The attacker needs no authentication or user interaction and can send crafted traffic over the network. The impact is limited to availability; IBM reports no confidentiality or integrity impact, but an outage would stop log ingestion and create blind spots in monitoring.

IBM · QRadar SIEM

CVE-2026-92559Critical 9.8

IBM App Connect Enterprise: Information disclosure via unrestricted IP binding

IBM App Connect Enterprise versions 13.0.1.0 through 13.0.8.2 bind to an unrestricted IP address. A remote attacker can obtain sensitive information, such as credentials, without authentication, according to IBM's CVSS base score of 9.8. The bulletin does not specify which listener or port is affected or which default configuration is involved.

IBM · App Connect Enterprise

CVE-2026-81212Critical 10.0

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data: Improper authorization allows Redis write

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 contains an improper authorization flaw. An unauthenticated remote attacker can write arbitrary data into the shared Redis store under any tenant's key. This can undermine the platform's credential-encryption boundary and allow poisoning of cached flow parameters for any tenant.

IBM · DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data

CVE-2026-76587High 8.8

IBM Planning Analytics: Stack-based buffer overflow allows code execution

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0 and 2.1 contain a stack-based buffer overflow caused by improper bounds checking. An attacker who can reach the affected service over the network could overflow the buffer and execute arbitrary code on the system. The CVSS vector indicates low attack complexity and low privileges required, with no user interaction.

IBM · Planning Analytics

CVE-2026-109126High 8.8

IBM Verify Identity Access: Hard-coded credentials allow privilege escalation

IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0.3.1 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0.9.3 Appliance contain hard-coded credentials (CWE-798). An attacker with physical or adjacent access can use them to gain elevated privileges. Because these identity and access management appliances control authentication for connected systems, a successful attack could affect confidentiality, integrity and availability across the environment. Exploitation requires no user interaction and only low complexity, but the attack vector is inconsistently described in the sources.

IBM · Verify Identity Access / Security Verify Access

CVE-2026-107400High 8.8

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform: Improper authentication allows code execution

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform versions 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 contain an improper authentication flaw (CWE-287, GWT Mock Authentication). A remote attacker with a valid low-privilege account can execute arbitrary code on the server, with high impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability. The CVSS 3.1 base score assigned by IBM is 8.8.

IBM · TRIRIGA Application Platform

CVE-2026-107366High 8.3

IBM Langflow OSS: Authorization bypass in message endpoints

IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.4 contain three message endpoints that do not verify ownership. Any authenticated user can bulk-delete other users' messages, overwrite message content with malicious prompts, or take over a conversation session by reassigning its session ID. Exploitation requires only a valid Langflow account over the network; the CVSS base score of 8.3 is provided by IBM as CNA.

IBM · Langflow OSS

Sources

The tracker combines official, freely usable data sources – updated continuously:

This product uses data from the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD. EPSS data © FIRST.org.

Affected? We can help.

We check whether your systems are affected, install updates and close the gap – continuously with the System Health Checker if you wish.