IT SBIT Services
Schneeberger
DEEN
CVE tracker

New vulnerabilities – clearly explained

Every newly published security vulnerability (CVE), continuously from the NVD, with the actively exploited ones from CISA, the probability of exploitation (EPSS) and public exploits – each one researched individually: what is affected, what helps, what to do.

301published today
3,400in the last 7 days
16,560in the last 30 days
262critical (7 days)
9newly exploited (7 days)
299with a public exploit (30 days)

New CVEs in the last 30 days by severity

  • Critical
  • High
  • Medium
  • Low
  • Not rated
01,0002,0003,000Sun, 4 Oct 2026: 68 CVE (Critical 13, High 16, Medium 28, Low 11)4 OctMon, 5 Oct 2026: 405 CVE (Critical 31, High 119, Medium 210, Low 45)Tue, 6 Oct 2026: 1,014 CVE (Critical 105, High 371, Medium 345, Low 38, Not rated 155)Wed, 7 Oct 2026: 340 CVE (Critical 53, High 131, Medium 145, Low 9, Not rated 2)Thu, 8 Oct 2026: 497 CVE (Critical 62, High 194, Medium 220, Low 21)Fri, 9 Oct 2026: 315 CVE (Critical 42, High 152, Medium 105, Low 11, Not rated 5)9 OctSat, 10 Oct 2026: 412 CVE (Critical 78, High 143, Medium 178, Low 13)Sun, 11 Oct 2026: 229 CVE (Critical 16, High 73, Medium 101, Low 39)Mon, 12 Oct 2026: 674 CVE (Critical 48, High 264, Medium 282, Low 80)Tue, 13 Oct 2026: 2,303 CVE (Critical 170, High 1,361, Medium 729, Low 43)Wed, 14 Oct 2026: 824 CVE (Critical 92, High 374, Medium 285, Low 30, Not rated 43)14 OctThu, 15 Oct 2026: 546 CVE (Critical 51, High 232, Medium 244, Low 19)Fri, 16 Oct 2026: 465 CVE (Critical 53, High 179, Medium 219, Low 14)Sat, 17 Oct 2026: 100 CVE (Critical 4, High 42, Medium 50, Low 4)Sun, 18 Oct 2026: 549 CVE (Critical 10, High 55, Medium 65, Low 19, Not rated 400)Mon, 19 Oct 2026: 437 CVE (Critical 29, High 128, Medium 204, Low 66, Not rated 10)19 OctTue, 20 Oct 2026: 1,923 CVE (Critical 169, High 814, Medium 812, Low 127, Not rated 1)Wed, 21 Oct 2026: 542 CVE (Critical 50, High 218, Medium 225, Low 47, Not rated 2)Thu, 22 Oct 2026: 492 CVE (Critical 69, High 161, Medium 208, Low 54)Fri, 23 Oct 2026: 492 CVE (Critical 40, High 170, Medium 91, Low 27, Not rated 164)Sat, 24 Oct 2026: 73 CVE (Critical 12, High 20, Medium 35, Low 6)24 OctSun, 25 Oct 2026: 131 CVE (Critical 4, High 35, Medium 66, Low 26)Mon, 26 Oct 2026: 738 CVE (Critical 21, High 147, Medium 257, Low 57, Not rated 256)Tue, 27 Oct 2026: 648 CVE (Critical 69, High 188, Medium 177, Low 33, Not rated 181)Wed, 28 Oct 2026: 626 CVE (Critical 35, High 223, Medium 214, Low 31, Not rated 123)Thu, 29 Oct 2026: 537 CVE (Critical 69, High 198, Medium 221, Low 22, Not rated 27)29 OctFri, 30 Oct 2026: 669 CVE (Critical 45, High 218, Medium 261, Low 30, Not rated 115)Sat, 31 Oct 2026: 112 CVE (Critical 11, High 44, Medium 51, Low 1, Not rated 5)Sun, 1 Nov 2026: 98 CVE (Critical 8, High 24, Medium 27, Low 15, Not rated 24)Mon, 2 Nov 2026: 301 CVE (Critical 23, High 97, Medium 131, Low 14, Not rated 36)2 Nov

Per day (UTC); hover over a bar for the figures.

Show as table
DayCriticalHighMediumLowNot ratedTotal
Mon, 2 Nov 202623971311436301
Sun, 1 Nov 202682427152498
Sat, 31 Oct 202611445115112
Fri, 30 Oct 20264521826130115669
Thu, 29 Oct 2026691982212227537
Wed, 28 Oct 20263522321431123626
Tue, 27 Oct 20266918817733181648
Mon, 26 Oct 20262114725757256738
Sun, 25 Oct 202643566260131
Sat, 24 Oct 20261220356073
Fri, 23 Oct 2026401709127164492
Thu, 22 Oct 202669161208540492
Wed, 21 Oct 202650218225472542
Tue, 20 Oct 202616981481212711,923
Mon, 19 Oct 2026291282046610437
Sun, 18 Oct 202610556519400549
Sat, 17 Oct 20264425040100
Fri, 16 Oct 202653179219140465
Thu, 15 Oct 202651232244190546
Wed, 14 Oct 2026923742853043824
Tue, 13 Oct 20261701,3617294302,303
Mon, 12 Oct 202648264282800674
Sun, 11 Oct 20261673101390229
Sat, 10 Oct 202678143178130412
Fri, 9 Oct 202642152105115315
Thu, 8 Oct 202662194220210497
Wed, 7 Oct 20265313114592340
Tue, 6 Oct 2026105371345381551,014
Mon, 5 Oct 202631119210450405
Sun, 4 Oct 202613162811068

3,400 vulnerabilities

CVE-2026-39782Medium 5.3

Research and translation in progress – available shortly.

CVE-2026-39736High 8.5

Crocoblock JetEngine: SQL injection in WordPress plugin

The WordPress plugin JetEngine by Crocoblock, up to and including version 3.9.0.1, contains an SQL injection vulnerability (CWE-89, CVE-2026-39736). An attacker with a low-privileged account, which Patchstack lists as Contributor, can send crafted input to read, modify or delete database content, including user data. The CVSS score is 8.5 according to the CNA, but NVD analysis is pending and the sources disagree on the score.

Crocoblock · JetEngine

CVE-2026-25467Medium 5.3

Research and translation in progress – available shortly.

CVE-2026-119054Medium 5.1

Research and translation in progress – available shortly.

CVE-2026-119053Medium 6.9

Research and translation in progress – available shortly.

CVE-2026-119052High 8.7

llama.cpp ggml-rpc server: Denial of service via oversized message length

llama.cpp builds from b2877 up to b11935 contain an uncaught exception in the ggml-rpc server (rpc-server), used for distributed inference across machines. After the HELLO handshake, an unauthenticated remote attacker can send a command such as SET_TENSOR with a length above the maximum vector size, which aborts the process and makes the service unavailable to all clients. Only confidentiality and integrity are unaffected; the impact is availability. Exposure of the RPC port is the main risk factor.

ggml-org · llama.cpp

CVE-2026-119051High 8.2

flat: Denial of service via unflatten() with numeric array index keys

The JavaScript npm library flat through version 6.0.1 allows attackers to create huge sparse arrays through unbounded numeric keys in unflatten(). Attackers can supply flattened keys such as a.4294967294, which causes iteration with forEach, spread or JSON.stringify to block the Node.js event loop. The attack is only relevant if an application passes attacker-controlled keys into unflatten(), and the impact is limited to availability.

hughsk · flat

CVE-2026-119050Critical 9.2

Agno PandasTools: Code execution via unsafe reflection

Agno through 3.1.11 contains an unsafe reflection flaw in the PandasTools toolkit. The tool passes model-supplied function names to getattr() on pandas, so an attacker who can influence the agent's input (for example through prompt injection in documents or messages) can make it call pandas.read_pickle on attacker-controlled paths to execute code, or call other readers to read local files. The CVSS 4.0 score is 9.2 (critical), and the reporter states that the default configuration is affected.

agno-agi · Agno

CVE-2026-119049High 7.2

Research and translation in progress – available shortly.

CVE-2026-119048Low 2.3

Research and translation in progress – available shortly.

CVE-2026-118425Medium 6.8

Research and translation in progress – available shortly.

CVE-2026-116857Medium 6.5

Research and translation in progress – available shortly.

CVE-2026-116402Medium 5.3

Research and translation in progress – available shortly.

CVE-2026-116399High 8.8

InstaWP Connect plugin: Cross-site request forgery

The WordPress plugin InstaWP Connect (instawp-connect) through version 0.1.4.2 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). An attacker can make a logged-in privileged user perform actions they did not intend, if that user visits a malicious link or page. The attacker needs no account on the site, but user interaction is required. The description does not state which action can be forged, so the real impact is unknown.

InstaWP · InstaWP Connect

CVE-2026-113697Medium 4.8

Research and translation in progress – available shortly.

CVE-2026-113696Medium 5.3

Research and translation in progress – available shortly.

CVE-2026-113695Medium 4.8

Research and translation in progress – available shortly.

CVE-2026-113694Medium 5.3

Research and translation in progress – available shortly.

CVE-2026-113693Medium 5.3

Research and translation in progress – available shortly.

CVE-2026-113692Medium 6.9

Research and translation in progress – available shortly.

CVE-2026-113691Medium 5.1

Research and translation in progress – available shortly.

CVE-2019-25781High 8.7

Python-Markdown: Denial of service via unmatched brackets in link parsing

Python-Markdown versions 3.0 through 3.11.2 contain an algorithmic complexity flaw in inline link parsing. A remote attacker can submit short Markdown with many unmatched [ or ![ characters, which forces quadratic scans and can keep server workers busy for minutes. No privileges or user interaction are required, but the risk only applies if an application renders Markdown from untrusted input.

Python-Markdown · Python-Markdown

CVE-2026-93011Medium 5.3

Research and translation in progress – available shortly.

CVE-2026-93008Medium 6.8

Research and translation in progress – available shortly.

CVE-2026-93007Medium 5.3

Research and translation in progress – available shortly.

Sources

The tracker combines official, freely usable data sources – updated continuously:

This product uses data from the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD. EPSS data © FIRST.org.

Affected? We can help.

We check whether your systems are affected, install updates and close the gap – continuously with the System Health Checker if you wish.

Get in touchRSS feed